GEOAXBOROT TIZIMLARINI LOYIHALASHNI O‘QITISHDA INTERAKTIV RAQAMLI TA’LIM PLATFORMALARIDAN FOYDALANISHNING METODIK IMKONIYATLARI
Kalit so‘zlar:
geoaxborot tizimlari, loyihalash metodikasi, raqamli texnologiyalar, oliy ta’lim, kasbiy kompetensiya, fazoviy tafakkur, interaktiv platforma, veb-xarita, raqamli qayta aloqa.Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada interaktiv platforma, geoma’lumotlar bilan hamkorlikda
ishlash va raqamli qayta aloqa masalalari ilmiy-metodik jihatdan tahlil qilinadi.
Tadqiqotning maqsadi bo‘lajak mutaxassislarga geoaxborot tizimlarini loyihalashni
o‘qitish uchun tekshiriladigan pedagogik yechimni asoslashdan iborat. Adabiyotlarni
qiyosiy o‘rganish, o‘quv vazifalarini modellashtirish va mezonli tahlil usullaridan
foydalanildi. Asosiy xulosa shuki, platformadagi har bir harakat o‘quv maqsadi, jarayon
izi va mezonli tahlil bilan bog‘lansa, raqamli muhit GAT loyihalashni o‘qitishning
mazmunli vositasiga aylanadi. Taklif etilgan yondashuvda texnik operatsiya, mustaqil
fikrlash va o‘quv natijasi o‘zaro bog‘liq holda ko‘riladi. Mazkur maqola tajriba-sinovda
olingan sonli natijalarni emas, balki amaliyotda tekshirilishi mumkin bo‘lgan metodik
modelni taqdim etadi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Training Manual. – Version 3.44. – 2026. – URL:
https://docs.qgis.org/3.44/en/docs/training_manual/index.html (murojaat sanasi: 16.10.2026).
2. Longley P. A., Goodchild M. F., Maguire D. J., Rhind D. W. Geographic Information Science and Systems. – 4th ed. –
Chichester: Wiley, 2015. – 496 p. – ISBN 978-1-118-67695-0.
3. UNESCO. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. – Version 3. – Paris: UNESCO, 2018. – 68 p. – ISBN
978-92-3-100285-4.
4. Open Geospatial Consortium. OGC API – Features – Part 1: Core. OGC Implementation Standard 17-069r3. –
Wayland, MA: OGC, 2019. – URL: https://docs.ogc.org/is/17-069r3/17-069r3.html (murojaat sanasi: 16.10.2026).
5. Favier T. T., van der Schee J. A. The Effects of Geography Lessons with Geospatial Technologies on the Development
of High School Students’ Relational Thinking // Computers & Education. – 2014. – Vol. 76. – P. 225–236. – DOI:
10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.004.
6. Gorelick N., Hancher M., Dixon M., Ilyushchenko S., Thau D., Moore R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-Scale
Geospatial Analysis for Everyone // Remote Sensing of Environment. – 2017. – Vol. 202. – P. 18–27. – DOI:
10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031.
7. Chen C.-H., Yang Y.-C. Revisiting the Effects of Project-Based Learning on Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-
Analysis Investigating Moderators // Educational Research Review. – 2019. – Vol. 26. – P. 71–81.
8. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V. I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence
Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Educators? // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education. – 2019. – Vol. 16. – Article 39. – DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
9. Radianti J., Majchrzak T. A., Fromm J., Wohlgenannt I. A Systematic Review of Immersive Virtual Reality
Applications for Higher Education: Design Elements, Lessons Learned, and Research Agenda // Computers & Education. –
2020. – Vol. 147. – Article 103778. – DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778.
10. Miao F., Holmes W. Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. – Paris: UNESCO, 2023. – ISBN 978-
92-3-100612-8. – DOI: 10.54675/EWZM9535.