ARALASH TA’LIM TEXNOLOGIYALARI ASOSIDA TALABALARNI TO‘GARAK FAOLIYATIGA JALB ETISH SAMARADORLIGINI BAHOLASH
Kalit so‘zlar:
aralash ta’lim, to‘garak faoliyati, baholash mezonlari, ishtirok darajalari, pedagogik tajriba-sinov, Styudent t-mezoni, motivatsiya.Abstrak
Maqolada aralash ta’lim texnologiyalari asosida talabalarni to‘garak faoliyatiga
jalb etish samaradorligini baholash mezonlari, ko‘rsatkichlari va darajalari hamda
2022–2025-yillarda uchta oliy ta’lim muassasasining 455 nafar talabasi ishtirokida
o‘tkazilgan tajriba-sinov natijalari yoritilgan. Baholash motivatsion, kognitiv, faoliyatli-
amaliy, kommunikativ-ijtimoiy va refleksiv-natijaviy mezonlar bo‘yicha amalga
oshirilgan. Tajriba boshida guruhlar o‘rtasida statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli farq
aniqlanmagan (t = 0,10–0,12). Tajriba yakunida tajriba guruhlarida yuqori daraja ulushi
28,9–33,8 % ni, nazorat guruhlarida esa 12,2–15,1 % ni tashkil etgan. Yakuniy
baholashda (n = 150) motivatsion munosabat ko‘rsatkichining o‘rtacha qiymati tajriba
guruhida 4,27, nazorat guruhida esa 3,62 bo‘lib, farq statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli
ekanligi aniqlangan (t = 6,19; kritik qiymat — 1,98).
Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2020-yil 23-sentabrdagi O‘RQ-637-son «Ta’lim to‘g‘risida»gi Qonuni // Qonunchilik
ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. – URL: https://lex.uz/docs/5013007.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 8-oktabrdagi PF-5847-son «O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim
tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida»gi Farmoni // Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy
bazasi. – URL: https://lex.uz/docs/4545884.
3. Graham C. R. Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions // The Handbook of
Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs / ed. by C. J. Bonk, C. R. Graham. – San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006. – P.
3–21.
4. Garrison D. R., Vaughan N. D. Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. – San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
5. Horn M. B., Staker H. Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2015.
6. Bernard R. M., Borokhovski E., Schmid R. F., Tamim R. M., Abrami P. C. A Meta-Analysis of Blended Learning and
Technology Use in Higher Education: From the General to the Applied // Journal of Computing in Higher Education. – 2014.
– Vol. 26, № 1. – P. 87–122.
7. Means B., Toyama Y., Murphy R., Bakia M., Jones K. Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A
Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. – Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, 2010.
8. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development,
and Well-Being // American Psychologist. – 2000. – Vol. 55, № 1. – P. 68–78.
9. Student. The Probable Error of a Mean // Biometrika. – 1908. – Vol. 6, № 1. – P. 1–25.
10. Welch B. L. The Generalization of “Student’s” Problem When Several Different Population Variances Are Involved
// Biometrika. – 1947. – Vol. 34, № 1–2. – P. 28–35.