PEDAGOGIK KVALIMETRIYA VOSITASIDA BIOLOGIYA O‘QITUVCHILARINING KASBIY TAYYORGARLIK SIFATINI ANIQLASH
Kalit so‘zlar:
pedagogik kvalimetriya, biologiya o‘qituvchisi, kasbiy tayyorgarlik, ta’lim sifati, baholash mezoni, indikator, metodik kompetentlik, diagnostika, pedagogik monitoring, refleksiv baholash.Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada pedagogik kvalimetriya vositasida biologiya o‘qituvchilarining
kasbiy tayyorgarlik sifatini aniqlashning nazariy va metodik asoslari yoritilgan.
Biologiya o‘qituvchisining kasbiy tayyorgarligi fan bilimlari, metodik faoliyat,
laboratoriya va amaliy mashg‘ulotlarni tashkil etish, raqamli ta’lim vositalaridan
foydalanish, pedagogik muloqot hamda refleksiv baholash kabi o‘zaro bog‘liq tarkibiy
qismlarning integrativ birligi sifatida talqin qilingan. Pedagogik kvalimetriyaning kasbiy
tayyorgarlik sifatini mezon, ko‘rsatkich, indikator va darajalar asosida obyektiv
baholashdagi imkoniyatlari ochib berilgan. Baholash jarayonida kognitiv-metodik,
amaliy-faoliyatli, raqamli-texnologik, kommunikativ va refleksiv komponentlarni
hisobga olish taklif etilgan. Shuningdek, test, amaliy topshiriq, mikrodars, laboratoriya
faoliyati, elektron portfolio, ekspert bahosi va o‘z-o‘zini baholash usullarini
uyg‘unlashtirishning ahamiyati asoslangan. Kvalimetrik yondashuv asosida olingan
natijalar o‘qituvchining kasbiy tayyorgarlik darajasini aniqlash, rivojlanish dinamikasini
kuzatish, mavjud metodik kamchiliklarni belgilash hamda individual kasbiy rivojlanish
yo‘nalishlarini ishlab chiqishga xizmat qiladi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Azgaldov G. G., Kostin A. V., Padilla Omiste A. E. The ABC of Qualimetry: The Toolkit for Measuring the
Immeasurable [Elektron resurs]. – Ridero, 2015. – 167 p. – ISBN 978-5-4474-2248-6. – URL:
https://www.labrate.ru/kostin/20150831_the_abc_of_qualimetry-text-CC-BY-SA.pdf.
2. Субетто А. И. Введение в квалиметрию высшей школы: в 4 кн. Кн. 3: Общая квалиметрия и специальные
теории квалиметрии. – Москва: Исследовательский центр проблем качества подготовки специалистов, 1991. –
171 с. – URL: https://isu.agni-
rt.ru/projects/elibrary/index.php?category=333&course=null&discipline=null&education_form=null&file=2585&list=1
80&page=view_list&speciality=null&view=1.
3. Shulman L. S. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching // Educational Researcher. – 1986. –
Vol. 15. – No. 2. – P. 4–14. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004.
4. Abell S. K. Twenty Years Later: Does Pedagogical Content Knowledge Remain a Useful Idea? // International
Journal of Science Education. – 2008. – Vol. 30. – No. 10. – P. 1405–1416. – DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041.
5. Park S., Oliver J. S. Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a
Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals // Research in Science Education. – 2008. – Vol. 38. – No. 3. – P.
261–284. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6.
6. Kind V. Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education: Perspectives and Potential for Progress //
Studies in Science Education. – 2009. – Vol. 45. – No. 2. – P. 169–204. – DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285.
7. Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu / ed. by Y. Punie. –
Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. – 95 p. – EUR 28775 EN. – DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2760/159770.
8. Brookhart S. M. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. – Alexandria, VA: ASCD,
2013. – 159 p. – URL: https://www.ascd.org/books/how-to-create-and-use-rubrics-for-formative-assessment-and-
grading.
9. Chen C., Sonnert G., Sadler P. M., Sunbury S. The Impact of High School Life Science Teachers’ Subject Matter
Knowledge and Knowledge of Student Misconceptions on Students’ Learning // CBE—Life Sciences Education. – 2020. –
Vol. 19. – No. 1. – Art. ar9. – P. 1–16. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164.
10. Großschedl J., Welter V., Harms U. A New Instrument for Measuring Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Pedagogical
Content Knowledge: The PCK-IBI // Journal of Research in Science Teaching. – 2019. – Vol. 56. – No. 4. – P. 402–439. – DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21482.
11. She J., Chan K. K. H., Wang J., Hu X., Liu E. Effect of Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge on
Student Achievement: Evidence from Both Text- and Video-Based Pedagogical Content Knowledge Tests // American
Educational Research Journal. – 2025. – Vol. 62. – No. 1. – P. 92–135. – DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312241278627.
12. Panadero E., Jonsson A., Pinedo L., Fernández-Castilla B. Effects of Rubrics on Academic Performance, Self-
Regulated Learning, and Self-Efficacy: A Meta-Analytic Review // Educational Psychology Review. – 2023. – Vol. 35. – Art.
113. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4.
