OLIY TA’LIM MUASSASALARI TALABALARIDA INGLIZ TILIDA AKADEMIK YOZISH KO‘NIKMALARINI SHAKLLANTIRISH VA RIVOJLANTIRISH
Kalit so‘zlar:
akademik yozuv, ingliz tili, oliy ta’lim, EFL, akademik savodxonlik, process-genre yondashuvi, janrga asoslangan ta’lim, fikr-mulohaza.Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada oliy ta’lim muassasalari talabalarida ingliz tilida akademik
yozish ko‘nikmalarini shakllantirish va rivojlantirishning nazariy-metodik asoslari tahlil
qilinadi. Akademik yozuv grammatik va leksik bilimlar bilan bir qatorda fikrni mantiqiy
tashkil etish, dalillash, akademik uslubdan foydalanish, manbalarni integratsiya qilish,
parafrazlash va iqtibos keltirish ko‘nikmalarini talab etadi. Maqolada process-genre
yondashuvi, janrga asoslangan ta’lim hamda o‘qituvchi va tengdoshlar fikr-
mulohazasining imkoniyatlari ilmiy adabiyotlar asosida ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tahlil
natijasida akademik yozuvni model matnni tahlil qilish, rejalashtirish, yozish, fikr-
mulohaza olish, tahrirlash va refleksiyani birlashtiruvchi izchil jarayon sifatida tashkil
etish maqsadga muvofiqligi asoslanadi.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Badger R., White G. A Process Genre Approach to Teaching Writing // ELT Journal. – 2000. – Vol. 54, No. 2. – P.
153–160. – DOI: 10.1093/elt/54.2.153
2. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month
Investigation // Applied Linguistics. – 2010. – Vol. 31, No. 2. – P. 193–214. – DOI: 10.1093/applin/amp016
3. Carless D., Boud D. The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback // Assessment
& Evaluation in Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 43, No. 8. – P. 1315–1325. – DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
4. Hyland K. Second Language Writing. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
5. Hyland K. Genre Pedagogy: Language, Literacy and L2 Writing Instruction // Journal of Second Language
Writing. – 2007. – Vol. 16, No. 3. – P. 148–164. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
6. Lea M. R., Street B. V. Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach // Studies in Higher
Education. – 1998. – Vol. 23, No. 2. – P. 157–172. – DOI: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
7. Nicol D. J., Macfarlane-Dick D. Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles
of Good Feedback Practice // Studies in Higher Education. – 2006. – Vol. 31, No. 2. – P. 199–218. – DOI:
10.1080/03075070600572090
8. Swales J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1990.
9. Wingate U. Using Academic Literacies and Genre-Based Models for Academic Writing Instruction: A ‘Literacy’
Journey // Journal of English for Academic Purposes. – 2012. – Vol. 11, No. 1. – P. 26–37. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006
10. Wingate U., Tribble C. The Best of Both Worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic
Literacies Writing Pedagogy // Studies in Higher Education. – 2012. – Vol. 37, No. 4. – P. 481–495. – DOI:
10.1080/03075079.2010.525630