AMALIY MATEMATIKA FANLARINI INTELLEKTUAL ADAPTIV TA’LIM TEXNOLOGIYALARI ASOSIDA O‘QITISHNING METODIK MODELI VA UNING ALGORITMIK TA’MINOTI
Kalit so‘zlar:
amaliy matematika, metodik model, intellektual adaptiv ta’lim texnologiyasi, bilim komponenti, bilimlarni Bayes usulida kuzatish, test topshiriqlari nazariyasi, aralash ta’lim, differensial tenglamalar.Abstrak
Maqolada oliy ta’lim muassasalarida amaliy matematika fanlarini intellektual
adaptiv ta’lim texnologiyalari asosida o‘qitishning metodik modeli taklif etilgan. Model
maqsadli, mazmuniy, tashkiliy-texnologik va baholash-natijaviy bloklardan iborat. Fan
mazmunini bilim komponentlari va tayanch bog‘lanishlar grafi ko‘rinishida
tuzilmalashtirish «Oddiy differensial tenglamalar» moduli misolida ko‘rsatilgan. Talaba
modelini yangilash uchun bilimlarni Bayes usulida kuzatish, topshiriq tanlash uchun
test topshiriqlari nazariyasining ikki parametrli modeli qo‘llangan; algoritmning
ishlashi hisoblash misolida namoyish etilgan. Talabaning bilim holatiga mos pedagogik
qaror qoidalari, aralash ta’lim sikli bosqichlari hamda metodika samaradorligini
baholash mezonlari va statistik usullari belgilangan.
Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 8-oktabrdagi “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-
yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi PF-5847-son Farmoni. – URL: https://lex.uz.
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 7-maydagi “Matematika sohasidagi ta’lim sifatini oshirish va
ilmiy-tadqiqotlarni rivojlantirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi PQ-4708-son Qarori. – URL: https://lex.uz.
3. Corbett A. T., Anderson J. R. Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge // User
Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. – 1995. – Vol. 4, № 4. – P. 253–278.
4. VanLehn K. The Behavior of Tutoring Systems // International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. –
2006. – Vol. 16, № 3. – P. 227–265.
5. Doignon J.-P., Falmagne J.-C. Knowledge Spaces. – Berlin: Springer, 1999. – 333 p.
6. Lord F. M. Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. – Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, 1980.
7. Koedinger K. R., Corbett A. T., Perfetti C. The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science-
Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning // Cognitive Science. – 2012. – Vol. 36, № 5. – P. 757–798.
8. Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 1978. – 159 p.
9. Bloom B. S. The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring
// Educational Researcher. – 1984. – Vol. 13, № 6. – P. 4–16.
10. Kulik J. A., Fletcher J. D. Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review // Review of
Educational Research. – 2016. – Vol. 86, № 1. – P. 42–78.
11. Hake R. R. Interactive-Engagement versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics
Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses // American Journal of Physics. – 1998. – Vol. 66, № 1. – P. 64–74.
12. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. – 2nd ed. – Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, 1988.
13. Baker R. S., Corbett A. T., Koedinger K. R., Wagner A. Z. Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When
Students “Game the System” // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004).
– New York: ACM, 2004. – P. 383–390.
14. Piech C., Bassen J., Huang J., Ganguli S., Sahami M., Guibas L., Sohl-Dickstein J. Deep Knowledge Tracing //
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. – 2015. – Vol. 28. – P. 505–513.
15. Aleven V., McLaughlin E. A., Glenn R. A., Koedinger K. R. Instruction Based on Adaptive Learning Technologies //
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction / Ed. by R. E. Mayer, P. A. Alexander. – 2nd ed. – New York: Routledge,
2017. – P. 522–560.
16. Растригин Л. А., Эренштейн М. Х. Адаптивное обучение с моделью обучаемого. – Рига: Зинатне, 1988. –
160 с.
17. Беспалько В. П. Образование и обучение с участием компьютеров (педагогика третьего тысячелетия). –
М.: МПСИ; Воронеж: МОДЭК, 2002. – 352 с.
18. Yunusova D. I. Matematikani o‘qitishning zamonaviy texnologiyalari. – Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya, 2011.
19. Freeman S., Eddy S. L., McDonough M., Smith M. K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M. P. Active Learning
Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 111, № 23. – P. 8410–8415.
20. Graham C. R. Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions // The Handbook of
Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs / Ed. by C. J. Bonk, C. R. Graham. – San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006. – P.
3–21.
21. Wilson R. C., Shenhav A., Straccia M., Cohen J. D. The Eighty Five Percent Rule for Optimal Learning // Nature
Communications. – 2019. – Vol. 10. – Art. 4646.