SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF USING NATIONAL CONTENT IN DEVELOPING THE PEDAGOGICAL MASTERY OF FUTURE TEACHERS
Keywords:
national content, pedagogical mastery, future teacher, national pedagogical heritage, folk pedagogy, pedagogical competence, comparative conceptual analysis, didactic integration, pedagogical reflection.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarning pedagogik mahoratini
rivojlantirishda milliy kontentdan foydalanishning ilmiy-nazariy va metodik asoslari
sharhiy-tahliliy yondashuv asosida o‘rganilgan. Milliy pedagogik meros, xalq og‘zaki
ijodi, ustoz-shogird an’analari, milliy qadriyatlar va mahalliy madaniy tajribaning
pedagogik ta’limdagi didaktik imkoniyatlari tahlil qilinadi. Qiyosiy-konseptual tahlil
yordamida pedagogik mahorat nazariyasi va culturally relevant pedagogy, culturally
responsive teaching hamda funds of knowledge konsepsiyalari qiyoslanadi. Milliy
kontentning qadriyaviy-motivatsion, kognitiv-metodik, kommunikativ, amaliy-faoliyatli
va refleksiv-baholovchi komponentlar bilan nazariy aloqadorligi asoslanadi.
Qadriyaviy-mazmuniy, didaktik-integrativ va amaliy-refleksiv yo‘nalishlarni qamrab
olgan konseptual mexanizm hamda “Pedagogik mahorat” fani uchun metodik
topshiriqlar tavsiya qilinadi.
References
1. Avloniy A. Turkiy guliston yoxud axloq. – 1913. – URL: https://asarlar.uz/kitob/turkiy-guliston-yoxud-axloq.
2. Qosimova G., Xoliyorova M. Abdulla Avloniyning “Turkiy guliston yoxud axloq” asarida ta’limiy-axloqiy masalalar
// Modern Education and Development. – 2025. – № 26, 3-qism. – B. 262–266. – URL:
https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/mead/article/view/117980.
3. Shulman L. S. Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform // Harvard Educational Review. – 1987.
– Vol. 57, № 1. – P. 1–23. – DOI: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411. – URL:
https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
4. Cochran-Smith M., Lytle S. L. Relationships of Knowledge and Practice: Teacher Learning in Communities //
Review of Research in Education. – 1999. – Vol. 24. – P. 249–305. – DOI: 10.3102/0091732X024001249. – URL:
https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001249.
5. Ladson-Billings G. Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy // American Educational Research Journal. –
1995. – Vol. 32, № 3. – P. 465–491. – DOI: 10.3102/00028312032003465. – URL:
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465.
6. Gay G. Preparing for Culturally Responsive Teaching // Journal of Teacher Education. – 2002. – Vol. 53, № 2. – P.
106–116. – DOI: 10.1177/0022487102053002003. – URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053002003.
7. Moll L. C., Amanti C., Neff D., González N. Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect
Homes and Classrooms // Theory Into Practice. – 1992. – Vol. 31, № 2. – P. 132–141. – DOI: 10.1080/00405849209543534.
– URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534.
8. Paris D. Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy: A Needed Change in Stance, Terminology, and Practice // Educational
Researcher. – 2012. – Vol. 41, № 3. – P. 93–97. – DOI: 10.3102/0013189X12441244. – URL: