TA’LIM TASHKILOTLARIDA KOMMUNIKATIV VA KOLLABORATIV MEXANIZMLAR ASOSIDA SAMARALI BOSHQARUVNI TASHKIL ETISH

Mualliflar

  • Nargiza Mannanova A. Avloniy nomidagi Pedagogik mahorat milliy instituti ##default.groups.name.author##

Kalit so‘zlar:

innovatsion boshqaruv, raqamli ta’lim tizimlari, EMIS, LMS, eMaktab, SWOT tahlili, PEST tahlili, Balanced Scorecard, KPI, taqsimlangan liderlik, hamkorlik, kommunikatsiya, ta’lim sifati, Professional Learning Community, raqamli transformatsiya.

Abstrak

Mazkur maqolada umumiy o‘rta ta’lim muassasalarida innovatsion boshqaruvni rivojlantirishda kommunikatsiya va hamkorlik mexanizmlarining o‘rni ilmiy-metodik jihatdan kompleks tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda EMIS, LMS va eMaktab kabi zamonaviy raqamli boshqaruv tizimlari bilan bir qatorda SWOT, PEST, Balanced Scorecard (BSC) va KPI kabi strategik boshqaruv metodologiyalari o‘rganilgan. Monitoring va baholash mexanizmlari, Professional Learning Community (PLC) modeli, taqsimlangan liderlik yondashuvlari hamda raqamli transformatsiya jarayonlari yagona integrallashgan tizim doirasida tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot natijalari mazkur vositalarning boshqaruv samaradorligi va ta’lim sifatini oshirishga sezilarli hissa qo‘shishini ko‘rsatadi. Innovatsion boshqaruvda kommunikativ, ijtimoiy va texnologik omillarning ahamiyati nazariy tahlil hamda empirik ma’lumotlar asosida asoslab berilgan.

Библиографические ссылки

1. Hallinger P., Heck R. H. Collaborative Leadership and School Improvement: Understanding the Impact on School Capacity and Student Learning // School Leadership & Management. – 2010. – Vol. 30, No. 2. – P. 95–110.

2. UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report: Non-state Actors in Education. – Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2021. – 410 p.

3. Bates T. Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age. – 2nd ed. – Vancouver: BCcampus, 2019. – 487 p.

4. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. – Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996. – 322 p.

5. Parmenter D. Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. – 3rd ed. – Hoboken: Wiley, 2015. – 386 p.

6. Siemens G., Long P. Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education // EDUCAUSE Review. – 2011. – Vol. 46, No. 5. – P. 31–40.

7. DuFour R., Eaker R., Many T. Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. – 2nd ed. – Bloomington: Solution Tree Press, 2010. – 280 p.

8. Hargreaves A., Fullan M. Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. – New York: Teachers College Press, 2012. – 240 p.

9. Spillane J. P. Distributed Leadership. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006. – 176 p.

10. Wheelen T. L., Hunger J. D. Strategic Management and Business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability. – 13th ed. – Upper Saddle River: Pearson, 2012. – 720 p.

11. Johnson G., Scholes K., Whittington R. Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and Cases. – 8th ed. – Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2008. – 1033 p.

12. OECD. Education at a Glance 2022: OECD Indicators. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. – 487 p.

13. Concept for the Development of the Education Sector of the Republic of Uzbekistan through 2030. – Tashkent, 2020. – 48 p.

14. Yusupov R. N. Problems of Improving Management Effectiveness in General Secondary Schools of Uzbekistan // Pedagogika va psixologiya. – 2021. – No. 3. – P. 45–52.

15. Rakhimov M. A. Digital Transformation in Educational Institutions: Opportunities and Barriers // Xalq ta’limi. – 2022. – No. 2. – P. 38–47.

Загрузки

Nashr qilingan

2026-06-27

Nashr

Bo'lim

13.00.00 Pedagogika fanlari

Как цитировать

TA’LIM TASHKILOTLARIDA KOMMUNIKATIV VA KOLLABORATIV MEXANIZMLAR ASOSIDA SAMARALI BOSHQARUVNI TASHKIL ETISH. (2026). Zamonaviy Ilmiy-Texnik Tadqiqotlar, 2(1), 177-184. https://ijcst.uz/index.php/journal/article/view/31